<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>searchology.com</title>
	<link>http://searchology.com</link>
	<description>A Conversation of Search Sematics</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Musings on the technology of search</title>
		<link>http://searchology.com/musings-on-the-technology-of-search/</link>
		<comments>http://searchology.com/musings-on-the-technology-of-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Searchologist</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technotech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchology.com/musings-on-the-technology-of-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the section that I think (this next section Technotech) is the section I think some people have really been waiting for. You might be one of them. If you’ve been holding out in other words for some tangible ideas this is just for you; this is just what you’re looking for. There are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://searchology.com/musings-on-the-technology-of-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Search</title>
		<link>http://searchology.com/the-future-of-search/</link>
		<comments>http://searchology.com/the-future-of-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Searchologist</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Innovative definitions of search
Hello and welcome to Searchology. 
First, search is really quite awful. It is terrible it in many, many ways. People take for granted just how bad it is and this is based on their experience with search. It’s not that good - most people don’t realize this. It is really quite nasty. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://searchology.com/the-future-of-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search is About Conversation</title>
		<link>http://searchology.com/search-is-about-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://searchology.com/search-is-about-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Searchologist</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Contextuality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Big Time Players]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Trending and Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Batteries included?]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technotech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search = Human]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[My SIMS - Second Self]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Collective Individuals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Old School Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchology.com/search-is-about-conversation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://searchology.com/search-is-about-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
